![]() The first one, and earliest, is the second-century Protevangelium of James and its later incorporation into the Armenian Infancy Gospel the second literary tradition, subject of this analysis, is that of the eight-century Gospel of Pseudo-Matthew 5, incorporated into the Libellus de Nativitate Sanctae Mariae 6, and, later, into the Legenda Aurea 7. 120.185-216 (.)ġAs the narratives on the conception, birth, presentation, and life at the temple of the Virgin are not recorded in the New Testament Gospels, it was the function of apocryphal literature to supplement missing parts of Mary’s youth that are found in two narrative traditions. 8 For both East and West, see for instance, Epiphanius the Monk, Life of the Virgin, PG.6 This chapter deals with Western sources, the author is aware of the existence of earlier Eastern so (.). ![]() ![]() The research concludes by emphasizing the use of common iconographic patterns, placed in the context of specific hagiographic tendencies in the late middle ages, and the emergence of new religious feasts in relation to liturgical developments. The present research also highlights the contribution of other iconographies, besides that of Christ’s, in the construction of Mary’s Presentation such as that of child oblation into monastic space. This section builds on the argument of Jacqueline Lafontaine-Dosogne that Mary’s Presentation is visually modeled on that of Christ’s, an assertion that needs further demonstration in order to determine the amount of such influence 4. One of these influences is the iconography of Christ’s entrance to the Temple 3, hence, the use of canonical iconography for non-canonical/apocryphal visual material. Beginning with the analysis of Mary’s Presentation to the Temple in textual sources, the core of the article highlights the contribution and use of various iconographies in building relatively new Marian imagery. The present chapter investigates the construction of Mary’s Presentation to the Temple as reflected in visual material pertaining mostly to thirteenth-sixteenth-century French 1 illuminated manuscripts in relation to fresco representations 2. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |